Fortnite is , and it’s soon going to be one of the most litigated too.
Apple on Thursday submitted its description of its souring relations with Fortnite developer Epic Games to the California court where the trial will take place, . In its filing, the tech giant argues that after making more than $700 million in the two years since publishing Fortnite on the iPhone’s App Store, Epic hatched a plan to make even more — and at Apple’s expense.
In its description of events, Apple outlined a media strategy called Project Liberty that Epic allegedly planned with its lawyers and public relations firm for months as an effort to draw attention to Fortnite.
Epic followed through bythat insist all digital products like Fortnite’s victory poses, dance moves and new looks for characters be purchased through its payment processing service. Apple then removed Fortnite from its App Store for violating its rules, — along with launching an ad campaign that went viral on social media.
“Epic just wants to free-ride on Apple’s innovation,” Apple said in its filing Thursday, arguing that Epic is using the lawsuit to “revive flagging interest in Fortnite.”
For many people, this is the latest twist in a corporate slap fight between a multibillion-dollar company and a trillion-dollar company over who makes more money when a gamer spends money. But for Apple, this represents anaround its iPhone, one of the .
Apple’s success has been driven in part by the App Store itself, a service Apple launched in 2008 offering developers a way to build special-purpose applications and games and then market them through Apple’s centralized service. Apple takes a commission of on digital items bought through those apps, a business model Apple says is designed to offset the . The tech giant only allows people to download iPhone apps from its App Store, and any developer who doesn’t agree to its terms is forced to create interactive websites instead.
Google has similar but less restrictive rules for its Play Store, requiring developers who publish apps on its service to pay commissions on digital goods sales. Google also allows users to “ ” apps and other app stores, effectively downloading competitor platforms onto their devices, something Apple doesn’t do. Still, the same day Epic broke Apple’s app store rules it did the same with Google and was similarly kicked out of Google’s Play Store. Epic is suing Google over Fortnite as well in a separate case.
In the 13 years since Apple’s App Store launched, it’s helped propel the iPhone to astronomical highs, with more than 1 billion handdsets being actively used as of January. During last year’s holiday season, which occurred at the end of a yearand resulting , the iPhone helped Apple notch new financial records. Its iPhone sales alone hit $65.6 billion, up 17% from a year prior.
The lawsuit, Apple says, is Epic attempt to change the iPhone’s business model. The company previously published emails in which Epic’s CEO Tim Sweeney, effectively allowing him to set up his own app store on the iPhone. If a court forces such a change, industry watchers say it could fundamentally change Apple’s business, disrupting not just its finances but also the security and reliability the company’s built around its tight control.
“Apple is among the most innovative, competitive, dynamic, and creative companies in the United States, and millions of people benefit from its products and services,” Apple said in its filing. “Those products and services are the result of billions of dollars of investment, in addition to substantial time and thought, and represent Apple’s intellectual property.”
Until August 2020, Apple and Epic seemed to have a pretty good thing going. In 2018, Epic announced its popular game Fortnite would be made available for free to play on Apple’s iPhones and iPads. Over the next two years, the companies raked in . Then, it unraveled when Epic attempted to circumvent Apple’s payment rules, leading to Fortnite being banned from the App Store and now an upcoming antitrust trial.
Apple used swaths of its filing to argue against Epic’s accusation that the iPhone and App Store rules constitute a monopoly. In its filing, Apple repeated earlier statements that it represents only a fraction of phones used around the world and that many of the apps built for the iPhone can interact with apps on other platforms. Apple invoked an earlier Supreme Court ruling as well, writing, that “antitrust laws ‘were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.'”
From its filing Apple is also arguing that Epic’s moves were carefully coordinated and designed to force either force Apple and Google to change their app store rules or.
Apple’s view into Project Liberty, as the plan was apparently called inside Epic, will likely include emails from executives as evidence, among other items. Apple also plans for CEO Tim Cook , along with other high-ranking Apple executives — all the audio of which is planned to be live-streamed from the court to YouTube starting May 3.
“Epic is asking this Court to force alternative terms on Apple so that Epic can make more money,” Apple said in its filing. “But Epic’s request would harm other developers and consumers, in addition to imposing unprecedented obligations on Apple to open its proprietary systems and engineering to third parties.”